Greenwashing is a term that sends shivers down the spines of communications, PR and marketing managers. No organisation wants to be accused of it, nor associated with it. In this article, we break down what it is, and how to avoid it altogether.
Consumers and investors alike care about sustainability. It’s time for a wake-up call for organisations that have not realised this yet.
As such, sustainability is a topic of consumer protection. Regulatory and supervisory authorities are on a hunt to crack down on greenwashing tactics.
Greenwashing refers to the act of conveying a false impression or providing misleading information that makes people believe that an organisation is doing more to be sustainable than it really is. Greenwashing, whether done intentionally or unintentionally, is a practice that is deceptive to eco-conscious consumers. Moreover, it fuels unfair competition while blocking true progress toward a sustainable planet.
The European Commission, the UK CMA, and the Dutch ACM are just a handful of regulatory authorities that have announced advance investigations into misleading and/or false information on sustainability. In 2022, the European Commission has already filed a proposal to amend the EU Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices. This proposal for amendment of the directive includes a prohibition of deceptive environmental claims. Similarly, in the US, the Securities andExchange Commission has taken action towards setting standards on ESG disclosures and the use of ESG terminologies towards investors.
Fashion brands have regularly been in the spotlight for making supposed eco-friendly and environmental claims that prove to be unsubstantiated.
Recently, companies such as H&M, ASOS, and ZARA are facing lawsuits in the US and the EU for their allegedly unfounded sustainability marketing. Questions have been raised about the legitimacy of claims around organic cotton, green products and complete fashion lines as well as overall claims of being an environmentally friendly brand.
In January 2021, the European Commission conducted a sweep (screening of websites) on 344 seemingly dubious sustainability claims and concluded that:
At the same time, organisations are strongly encouraged to set ambitious ESG goals. This should be followed by disclosing their sustainability journey in a transparent and coherent way. Changing business as usual does not happen overnight. Those who take an effort to step up must be acknowledged for their continuous work.
However, without a clear worldwide accepted definition of “sustainability”, it can be challenging for organisations to avoid the lava floor while heading towards greener grounds. This does not need to be a bottleneck. Therefore, we provide some tips on how to avoid greenwashing.
There are two types of greenwashing. The first one is with regard to claims on products /services offered. An example is the “Responsible Edit” collection of ASOS, for which the company had selected items for the collection based on certain sustainability criteria. These criteria did not meet the reasonable expectation consumers could have when the products were offered as “a responsible collection".
The second type of greenwashing is with regard to claims made about an organisation’s operations as a whole. In 2020, RyanAir claimed that they had “the lowest emissions of any major airline”. They were called back by the UK Advertising Standards Authority for portraying outdated information (2011 data was used for the claims made) and omitting relevant factors for calculating their emissions.
As the person responsible for sustainability in your organisation, it's important to work with your communications department to make sure to prevent greenwashing. Here are 6 simple questions you can ask internally: