Let’s assume your organisation has measured overall Greenhouse Gas emissions, understands its environmental impact and has set ambitious targets for emission reduction on all or some of the emitting sources. Even better, reduction targets have been validated by the Science-based Target Initiative (SBTi), endowing them with further recognition. Specific emission reduction targets will indeed give you, and people working in your organisation, strong goals to guide all future decision-making processes and business activities.
Today, more than 1250 organisations around the world have set SBTs in line with the Paris agreement. But how are they going to achieve these targets? As an organisation, you might have also found yourself asking the question: How do I reduce my overall carbon footprint and achieve my targets in the short and long term?
By implementing these actions, you will not only contribute to the achievement of a net-zero society – you will also improve your reputation and anticipate changes in technology, regulations and customers’ behaviour.
When we talk about scope 1 emissions, we are referring to all those GHGs emitted by owned or controlled stationary and mobile sources, such as machinery and vehicles owned or leased by your employer to conduct your business activity.
Some opportunities to reduce emissions from scope 1 are:
How? By switching to machinery, vehicles, or equipment that consumes less energy for the same outcome. You will not only reduce your energy consumption – and your bill – you will also avoid the combustion of fuels for energy production, and therefore the release into the atmosphere of GHGs from the combustion. That is the case when you decide to buy a more fuel-efficient truck or boiler for heating production.
An example: UPS has a commitment to purchase up to 10,000 electric vehicles in 2020, which will allow reducing emissions from its fossil fuel combustion (read more here).
Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling are included in scope 2.
Some opportunities to reduce emissions from scope 2 are:
An example: Ferrero is on a path to sourcing 100% green electricity for its plants, which will contribute to reaching the 2030 goal of cutting the emissions from its operations by 50% (read more here).
Scope 3 emissions include all other indirect emissions that occur throughout the value chain (upstream and downstream), which are split into 15 different categories. These include business travel, upstream and downstream transportation and distribution, capital goods, and processing of sold products. In most cases, scope 3 accounts for most of the total company’s GHG emissions.
Emissions reduction strategies in Scope 3 are definitely the most challenging ones to tackle. Because of a lack of direct control over the sources of these emissions, companies need to think out of the box and pursue collaboration with all actors in their value chain – from raw materials extractors to the end consumers.
Some opportunities for carbon reduction from scope 3 are:
An example: Lloyds Banking Group provides a Green Salary Sacrifice scheme which enables employees to take advantage of significant tax benefits when leasing an electric vehicle. The Group is also rolling out electric vehicle charging points across the company’s car parks (read more here).
Not all the above-mentioned GHG reduction strategies are feasible or needed in every organisation. Both because the emission hotspots to be tackled might differ from one to the other, and some reduction solutions might be more or less feasible for companies operating in different sectors. Once you have a list of possible reduction strategies, the following should be determined for each opportunity:
This information will allow you to calculate the potential climate return on investment for each opportunity and to prioritise the most climate and cost-effective solutions in line with your activity.
In general, companies start reducing carbon emissions that are closer to the core (Scope 1 and 2 emissions). That is because such emissions are generated by sources they own or control, therefore easier to tackle. By contrast, Scope 3 emissions are the least targeted and most challenging to control ones, because generated by sources not directly owned by the business - such as raw material extraction and logistic.
However, in most cases, Scope 3 emissions can account for more than 50% of an organisation's total GHG emissions. That is why it is very important to intensify efforts to refine calculation methods and reduction strategies of Scope 3 emissions.
Reducing your carbon footprint will not only allow you to contribute to a sustainable future for all. You will be able to thrive in a continuous changing world, by meeting your stakeholder expectations and reducing the risk of higher costs and regulations linked to climate change.
So why not start now? Be a front runner and an example to your peers. Put into action your strategy and targets. Let’s not waste time, let’s reduce now!